Protecting our sources
Newspaper reporters depend a lot of
outside sources to get to the bottom of many stories. In
fact some stories would never be written if it were not for
those “unnamed sources” that tell the media, behind a cloak
of secrecy, about something amiss in a governmental agency,
corporation, school or business. Many a public official or
corporate executive have met their downfall through such
exposure. Now a state legislator is trying to protect
journalists at the behest of some of the state’s largest
media representatives. I say it is past due and a long time
coming.
Media attorney Laura Lee Prather was
quoted as saying the media currently has no protection under
the law and the general public is therefore being harmed
when she testified before state officials recently.
Under a proposal the news groups are
calling the “Free Flow of Information Act,” government
agencies, as a general rule, could not force a journalist to
disclose legally obtained information from a confidential or
non-confidential source.
Thirty-two states and the District of
Columbia have a shield law, she said.
Prosecutors and many in law enforcement
do not support the proposed law change. They fear the
secrecy of the Texas grand jury system would be compromised.
Horse petunias! The Texas Grand Jury
system is seldom without leaks and while it is a violation
to tell about what is going on behind those sacred doors,
often a courthouse coffee shop can quickly dispel the rumor
that the sanctity of the grand jury is always maintained.
In most cases an informant or
confidential source is hesitant to give the media
information even though they want wrongdoing brought out in
public, for fear they will be discovered and suffer
repercussions. And while the media wants to keep sources
secret, they often are forced to disclose this information
or go to jail themselves. A few of the national media types
have steadfastly, and with grandiose pomp, marched to jail
in handcuffs while vowing to keep their sources secret
forever. While all of us in the smaller media admire this
virtuous act and envy the big bucks that come after such
name recognition and notoriety, few of us really want to eat
jail cuisine even if our jail does brag about the best
little kolaches in Texas.
Most of the time our sources are eager to
be revealed, but there are those who are not and have
critical information. For that reason, I personally hope the
legislators consider this act and give us a little more
leeway in bringing forth critical news stories to the
public.
While it is not uncommon to read in a story “sources say”
that can mean we have so blamed many of them, it would be
silly to list them all. Or it can mean we have a couple very
scared folks trying to tell a story behind a veil of secrecy
and fear. You just never know.