It’s not nice to fool Bev Carter....After
I wrote last week about a group of “concerned residents” in
New Territory who had gotten together, interviewed
candidates, and then passed out fliers, made phone calls,
block-walked, and generally campaigned for those they liked,
I found out they had not exactly told me the truth. I talked
to New Territory resident and FBISD board president Lisa
Rickert, Pct. 4 Constable Troy Nehls, and resident Bart
Hatfield.
• First, I found out they were continuing
to use the name “New Territory Votes,” even though they
claimed to have quit using the name. However, an email sent
out by Lisa Rickert as recently as Feb. 6, 2006, used the
name “New Territory Votes” and billed themselves as “leaders
in the community (Not affiliated with the New Territory
Residential Community Association).”
The email included the names of Rickert,
Nehls, three board members of the New Territory Residential
Community Associ-ation including Nehls’ twin brother who is
a Sugar Land policeman, the manager of the Residential
Community Assn., and Hatfield, the president, plus a couple
of other interested residents.
• Come to find out, this is the FOURTH
election in which the group has been active, rather than the
three elections they claimed to me last week.
• According to the minutes of the New
Territory Residential Community Assn., the group will pay
for advertising in the New Territory newsletter. This
expense, coupled with the expense of printing fliers (even
donated fliers must be considered as “in kind”
contributions), would seem to put the group over the $500
limit for four elections. Constable Nehls claimed to me they
had no expenses.
It is interesting to note that the email
was sent out with the titles of the people participating,
i.e. board president and constable. Since the purpose of the
group is to elect people that support the New Territory
neighborhoods, it is questionable that officials elected by
more voters than simply the New Territory voters would want
to trade on their larger political positions for which they
were elected to support all the people, rather than a
subdivision.
Although it is commendable that neighbors
want to get together and participate in the political
process, it is significant that the two elected officials
should know that a political action committee must be
registered and a 60 day waiting period is in effect. Of
course, we don’t currently have a district attorney that
will take any action on these type of questions.
According to Susan Johnson, a community
volunteer, “As a resident of Fort Bend County, I am deeply
concerned that a trustee elected to represent all children
in Fort Bend ISD and a constable elected to assist all
residents of Precinct 4 appear to be most interested in
promoting those who ‘demonstrate a willingness to listen and
respond to the voters of our (New Territory) community.’ It
further concerns me that these officials would use their
titles for political purposes. As individual citizens, we
are all free to espouse our views. However, I strongly
object to adding titles such as ‘Constable, Precinct 4’ or
‘President, Fort Bend Independent School District’ to
endeavors that have nothing to do with the office, thus
implying sanction by the school district and/or county.”
According to Republican County Chair Eric
Thode, “In order to do this (act as a PAC), they MUST be
registered as a political action committee and file reports
with the Texas Ethics Commission. You would think the
President of FBISD’s board and a Constable who is supposed
to uphold the law---could follow the law. They are clearly
violating the spirit of the law."
It’s not getting any better.....I
thought the school board controversy had settled down until
I heard last week that three board members left an executive
board meeting then later went to see the district attorney
about what they could do to protect themselveswhen the open
meeting laws were being violated. Leaving were Bruce Bain,
Sue Hausenstein, and Cynthia Knox. I don’t know if Stan
Magee coming to the meeting with a list of approximately 27
FBISD employees who he thinks should be fired had anything
to do with the walkout or not.
The deadline for filing for a place on
the school board is fast approaching. Hauenstein and Bain
have expiring terms and both have expressed a reluctance to
run again. (As in “Heck, NO!”) Whoever runs and wins will be
making a great sacrifice to put up with the bunk that is
going on there now. Even if two intelligent, polite, sane
people win, they will still be in the minority for the next
couple of years until the voters can speak about the job
they think Rickert and Ken Bryant are doing. Or we can just
continue to elect people who don’t believe in Fort Bend ISD
and want to completely upend the district.
I’ve said from Day One that Fort Bend ISD
probably needed some changes made, but it didn’t need to be
thrust into chaos. Any new board members will probably have
some new ideas. However, the mark of good leaders is taking
good ideas, and implementing them without damaging the good
things that already exist.