I think it all started with my thinking
that hedonism was counterintuitive. Like, wouldn’t
pleasure-seeking be more effective if an individual didn’t
actively go looking for pleasure? Seeking pleasure seems to
take out the leisure aspect of it all. And it seems to
devalue any pleasure one may actually end up finding.
But then, I started to think of how we –
students – tend to satiate hedonist tendencies in order to
decipher some sort of pattern. I mean, this would be the
only way I’d be able to gauge whether people generally tend
to actively pick up things they enjoy or whether they just
seem to happen to them.
The first thing that struck me
was...FOOD. High school students have insane cravings for
food and innate abilities to sink into a dish with hearty
abandon. Honestly, I believe that food is a funny method of
escapism; the activity of eating requires no advanced mental
processes, no real pondering. Just simple lift and consume
mechanism.
The next most obvious example is video
gaming. Countless students have mastered the art of keeping
their eyes glued fixedly at a glaring, noisy screen for
hours on end. Level to level, move after move, they remain
transfixed. Really, what better way to escape than into the
pixilated abyss of a video game? There are some superficial
goals and targets to reach, some robust main characters to
take up the guises of, and some loud apex of annoying,
gaming sounds to outdo, but, really, it’s the paragon of
purposeful pointlessness. Brilliant.
And then there’s music. If the most
fitting music is selected, one can drown happily in
symphonic waves. Yes, music is a great outlet, as you can
turn it up as loud as necessary to muffle the sounds of the
surrounding world.
But, again, none of this requires any
thought. It’s pure escapism. These pleasures parade under
various names: pastimes, hobbies, whims, guilty pleasures,
indulgences, and cravings. But really, these are just labels
made to mask the reality of a proactive choice to indulge,
to seek pleasure. The labels try to make said activities
appear involuntary, as though some magnetic field binds an
individual to it.
So what does it mean, really, if in a
time when ignorance is rampant, that life’s sensuous
pleasures trump the intellectual wonderment in individuals,
the desire to think actively? People seek to escape
increasingly, without any real contingent spike in pressure
or obligations. So the whole deal can’t be connected
necessarily to things like stress. And it isn’t necessarily
just a rise in notions that people should “be themselves”
and give in to their inner gluttons.
Maybe people can’t always reconcile their
idea of life with reality. Maybe they feel that something
about real life is revolting, or at least disconcerting.
After all, we as people have a definite proclivity to form
life in our own image, try to shape people and things around
us the way that we want them, and then feel critical if
something doesn’t work.
So escapism works. Not just as an actual
escape from duress, ennui, or worry. But also as a method to
ensure that the simple world we want to dip into exists
somewhere.